Skip to main content

An Introduction to court terms (the common terms)

Many people will tell you that reporting from the courts is not easy because of the language that the lawyers use. Some will say the language used in court is Latin.
This is not correct. It is about misconception with regards to what transpires in the courts. At the courts, the lawyers and the judges speak in the English Language. At times, there are unfamiliar terms used in the court but you have to remember as a journalist you have the duty to ask the lawyers or the judge or magistrate to help you with the spellings and the meaning of words. This does not happen always. In fact, it happens occasionally.
This post intends to take you through the common words used in court and give the simplest meaning to them. This is to help people understand the meaning and know how to use them in their reports.

1.    Plaintiff: A person who takes another person to court. The plaintiff is called the claimant. He is the one who is claiming for something before the court and this is only for civil cases. The Plaintiff can be a human being or a company such as banks, business entities, schools, media houses, hospitals and many others.

2.    Defendant: This is a term used in both civil and criminal cases. A defendant is a person who is brought to court. In civil cases, the defendant is brought by the plaintiff while in criminal cases the defendant is also called the accused person. Also, the defendant can be a human being or a company such as banks, schools, media houses etc.

3.    Charge Sheet: Is the sheet (paper) carrying the charges the accused person is charged with. It usually has the name of the accused person, the offence (s) committed and the particulars of the offence (s).

4.     Particulars of Claim: In civil cases, it is the explanation of the claims. This means it is what explains the complaint before the court. It is always written. It explains why the plaintiff is making the claims.

5.    Statement of claim: It is usually a summary of what the plaintiff is claiming. It is usually explained in the particulars of claim. For example: If I sue you, I have to tell the court why I brought you before the court. That is the claim. I can sue you for defamation. That is the claim. The particular of the claim is what would explain the claim.

6.    Statement of Offence: This applies to only criminal cases. It is the charge itself. It will explain what offence the accused person is charged with and the section of the law the offence is found.

7.    Particulars of Offence: This is what will explain the statement of offence. It explains when the offence was committed, how it was done and who committed the offence. It also states the place the crime was committed.

8.    Submission, application, objection, record and file: These are simple English words that each and every person is expected to know.

9.    Examination: The questioning of a witness on oath or affirmation. In court, a witness is subject to questioning by lawyers. The first one is called examination-in-chief, followed by cross-examination, and final re-examination. Let me explain: Examination-in-chief is the first questioning by the lawyer who brings the witness. Examination-in-chief is the questioning of a witness by the party who called him to give evidence. If the witness is brought by the prosecution, the lawyer of the prosecution will be the first to ask. This is what is called examination-in-chief. If also, the witness is called by the defendant then the first questioning by his lawyer is what is called examination-in-chief. If the first lawyer asks his questions then the other lawyer will be given the chance to ask the witness questions. This is what is called cross-examination. The questioning of a witness by a party other than the one who called him to testify. It may be to the issue, i.e. designed to elicit information favourable to the party on whose behalf it is conducted and to cast doubt on the accuracy of evidence given against that party; or to credit, i.e. designed to cast doubt upon the credibility of the witness. The purpose of cross-examination is to discredit the witness. The re-examination will come after cross-examination. This is done by the lawyer who first asks the questions. The purpose of re-examination is to clarify ambiguities that arise from the cross-examination.

To be continued.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Decision in Lawyer Darboe’s Tax Case

The Supreme Court of The Gambia has on the 28 th January 2020 upheld the decision of the Court of Appeal that Lawyer Ousainou Darboe only paid his taxes for the period concerned to fulfil his political obligations to contest in the Presidential elections. The Judgment was delivered by Justice M.M. Sey and the other four judges in the persons of Justices Hassan B. Jallow (Chief Justice), G.B. Samega Janneh, R.C. Sock and Cherno Sulayman Jallow all agreed with her judgment. Darboe’s appeal arose from a decision of the Gambia Court of Appeal delivered on 14 th June 2016 dismissing his appeal against the adverse findings made in relation to him as contained in the report of the Commission of Inquiry into Tax Evasion and other Corrupt Practices in The Gambia from 1999 – 2011. The Commission was issued by the former President of the Republic of The Gambia, in the exercise of the powers conferred on him by Section 200 of the 1997 Constitution of The Republic of The Gambia and...
Post a Comment
Read more

Understanding the courts for a beginner in court reporting

Many journalists do not appreciate reporting from the courts. This is as a result of several issues but mainly lack of understanding of the trade. Notwithstanding, some of the journalists are made to believe that reporting from the courts is risky. Take a look at the media fraternity, you can point out the court reporter as opposed to the other media fields. As a beginner, you have to understand the basics of court reporting. This write-up intends to take you through some of the basics of court reporting. I will be writing in series for the ease of understanding of many.  Why court reporting? The Constitution provides that all trials should be held in the public except wherein explicitly stated otherwise. Journalists are allowed to go to court and report the court proceedings. As a reporter, you are not required to add anything to what is been said or done before the court. In one way, one can argue that it is very risky to report from ...
1 comment
Read more

Niang Sarang Jobe continues in her pursuit for justice

Niang Sarang Jobe, a co-victim of the December 2004 gunshot attack which claimed the life of Deyda Hydara, a co-founder of The Point Newspaper said she won’t relent in her pursuit for justice. Nyang Sarang was in a vehicle together with late Deyda Hydara, and one Ida Jagne on the night of the 16th December 2004, when they were attacked by unknown gunmen. Jobe sustained serious bullet injuries and as a result of the injuries, she could not engage in gainful employment for seven years. On the 18th November 2018, Niang Sarang Jobe brought a case before the High Court seeking an order for Mandamus compelling the Government of The Gambia through the Attorney General to provide her adequate compensation. The application was supported by a 12-paragraph affidavit sworn to by Niang Sarang Jobe. On the 27 th day of May 2020, the High Court presided over by Justice Sainabou Wadda Cisse struck out the case of Niang Sarang Jobe versus the Attorney General. In her judgment, Justice Saina...
Post a Comment
Read more