Skip to main content

Lawyer Wants Court to Sign Subpoena for TRRC to Produce Edward Singhatey’s Testimony Regarding Koro Ceesay’s Demise

Defence Counsel A. Sisoho has made an application for the Banjul High Court to sign a subpoena ordering the Executive Secretary of the TRRC to produce official statement of Edward Singhatey, a former member of the AFPRC.

Edward Singhatey, together with Yankuba Touray (the accused person), were both members of the Armed Forces Provisional Ruling Council (AFPRC) after toppling the regime of ex-President Sir Dawda Kairaba Jawara in July 1994.

Touray, a retired military captain is accused of murdering Ousman Koro Ceesay who was the Minister of Finance in June 1995 at his residence in Kerr Sering.

When the question was put to Singhatey before the Truth, Reconciliation and Reparations Commission (TRRC) he denied participating in the murder of Ousman Koro Ceesay.  Singhatey vehemently denied knowledge of the accusation levied against him and Touray as he rebuffed Kanyi’s allegation that they all participated in the murder of Koro Ceesay.

When Yankuba Touray was asked to give testimony before the TRRC, he rescinded from testifying as he relied on his claimed constitutional immunity. This was when he was arrested and tried based on the allegation made against him by ex-Corporal Alagie Kanyi of Jarra Sankuya.

The prosecution called nine witnesses to prove their case but after closing their case, Yankuba’s lawyer made a ‘no case of submission’ saying his client has no case to answer. The high court judge, Justice Ebrima Jaiteh dismissed the application and asked the ex-military officer turned politician to open his defence.

Touray brought his sister-in-law, Awa Minteh as his first defence witness. She gave her evidence-in-chief and was cross-examined by the prosecution. Following Awa’s discharged by the court, the Defence Lawyer Sisoho made the application for the court to sign the subpoena ordering for the production of documents by the Judicial Secretary and the Executive Director of the TRRC.

One of the subpoena was for the court to order the Judicial Secretary to produce the Coroner’s Inquest Report in respect of the dead of Ousman Koro Ceesay and the other was for the court to order for the Executive Secretary of the Truth, Reconciliation and Reparations Commission (TRRC) to produce the official statement of Edward Singhatey and his statement regarding the dead of Ousman Koro Ceesay. Both motions for the subpoena were dated the 15th June 2020.

Lawyer Sisoho relied on sections 220 and 221 of the Evidence Act as well as section 241 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC) when he moved his motion for the subpoenas to be signed.

“They (Judicial Secretary and the Executive Secretary of the TRRC) are not going to give evidence but to produce documents,” Sisoho said.

Lawyer Sisoho’s application for the court to sign the subpoena was supported by a 20-paragraph affidavit. 

“I want to submit straight away that there is no affidavit in opposition to the affidavit in support. It is trite that an affidavit which stands unchallenged, undenied and uncontroverted is deemed as admitted,” Sisoho told the court as he relied on several decided court cases.

Sisoho maintained that the documents they are seeking through the Judicial Secretary and the Executive Secretary of the TRRC are very essential to their defence.

“We urge the court to sign the subpoena filed on the 15th June 2020,” Sisoho said.

He added: “With humility, without the production of these documents will cause great hardship to the accused and will amount to a denial of his constitutional right to a fair hearing. The documents are very crucial to his defence.”

Sisoho informed the court that prosecution witness six, Alagie Kanyi testified regarding the dead of Ousman Koro Ceesay and gave two versions of the incident. Sisoho said in one of his versions, Kanyi mentioned that it was Edward Singhatey who killed Koro Ceesay and in the other, he said it was a group who participated in the murder of Koro Ceesay.

The senior lawyer said to clear the air it will be prudent for the documents to be produced.

The matter was adjourned to the 6th July 2020 @2 pm for the reply on the two motions. The State prosecution team has indicated they will object to the two motions.

 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Magistrate sends Chairman, members of 3 Years Jotna to Mile 2

A trial magistrate has on Wednesday, 30 th January remanded the chairman and 7 members of the 3 Years Jotna Movement to Mile 2. Magistrate P. Sarr remanded the accused persons pending their arraignment before the high court for lack of jurisdiction to try the third count. The transfer of the case to the high court came through an application by the prosecuting officer –Superintendent M.D. Mballow although it was opposed by the defence lawyer – Lawyer Lamin S. Camara. The accused persons are; Abdou Njie, the chairman of the movement, Ebrima Kitim Jarju, Sheriffo Sonko, Hagi Suwaneh (the spokesperson), Fanta Mballow, Karim Touray, Yankuba Darboe (alias Yanks Darboe) and Muctarr Ceesay. They 3 charges are; unlawful assembly, rioting after proclamation and rioters demolishing structures contrary to sections 70, 74 and 76 of the Criminal Code respectively. Mballow applied for the court to transfer the matter to the high court because the court lacks the jurisdiction t
1 comment
Read more

Understanding the courts for a beginner in court reporting

Many journalists do not appreciate reporting from the courts. This is as a result of several issues but mainly lack of understanding of the trade. Notwithstanding, some of the journalists are made to believe that reporting from the courts is risky. Take a look at the media fraternity, you can point out the court reporter as opposed to the other media fields. As a beginner, you have to understand the basics of court reporting. This write-up intends to take you through some of the basics of court reporting. I will be writing in series for the ease of understanding of many.  Why court reporting? The Constitution provides that all trials should be held in the public except wherein explicitly stated otherwise. Journalists are allowed to go to court and report the court proceedings. As a reporter, you are not required to add anything to what is been said or done before the court. In one way, one can argue that it is very risky to report from the court but on another line
1 comment
Read more

Supreme Court Decision in Lawyer Darboe’s Tax Case

The Supreme Court of The Gambia has on the 28 th January 2020 upheld the decision of the Court of Appeal that Lawyer Ousainou Darboe only paid his taxes for the period concerned to fulfil his political obligations to contest in the Presidential elections. The Judgment was delivered by Justice M.M. Sey and the other four judges in the persons of Justices Hassan B. Jallow (Chief Justice), G.B. Samega Janneh, R.C. Sock and Cherno Sulayman Jallow all agreed with her judgment. Darboe’s appeal arose from a decision of the Gambia Court of Appeal delivered on 14 th June 2016 dismissing his appeal against the adverse findings made in relation to him as contained in the report of the Commission of Inquiry into Tax Evasion and other Corrupt Practices in The Gambia from 1999 – 2011. The Commission was issued by the former President of the Republic of The Gambia, in the exercise of the powers conferred on him by Section 200 of the 1997 Constitution of The Republic of The Gambia and
Post a Comment
Read more